🔗 Share this article

These days exhibit a very unusual occurrence: the inaugural US march of the caretakers. They vary in their skills and attributes, but they all possess the same mission – to prevent an Israeli infringement, or even devastation, of Gaza’s unstable peace agreement. Since the war ended, there have been few occasions without at least one of Donald Trump’s representatives on the territory. Just in the last few days saw the likes of a senior advisor, a businessman, a senator and Marco Rubio – all arriving to carry out their roles.

The Israeli government engages them fully. In only a few days it initiated a wave of operations in the region after the loss of two Israeli military troops – leading, according to reports, in scores of Palestinian casualties. A number of leaders called for a restart of the war, and the Israeli parliament approved a initial measure to annex the occupied territories. The US stance was somehow ranging from “no” and “hell no.”

However in several ways, the US leadership seems more concentrated on maintaining the current, uneasy period of the truce than on moving to the following: the rehabilitation of the Gaza Strip. Concerning this, it appears the United States may have goals but little tangible proposals.

At present, it is uncertain when the planned global governing body will truly assume control, and the identical applies to the designated military contingent – or even the composition of its soldiers. On a recent day, a US official said the US would not impose the composition of the international unit on the Israeli government. But if Benjamin Netanyahu’s administration continues to refuse one alternative after another – as it acted with the Ankara's suggestion lately – what follows? There is also the contrary question: who will decide whether the units favoured by the Israelis are even willing in the assignment?

The question of the timeframe it will require to neutralize the militant group is equally unclear. “The expectation in the leadership is that the global peacekeeping unit is going to now take charge in neutralizing the organization,” remarked the official recently. “It’s may need a while.” The former president further emphasized the ambiguity, stating in an discussion on Sunday that there is no “fixed” deadline for Hamas to disarm. So, hypothetically, the unknown elements of this still unformed international contingent could enter Gaza while the organization's fighters still remain in control. Would they be facing a leadership or a militant faction? Among the many of the questions surfacing. Others might ask what the verdict will be for ordinary residents under current conditions, with the group persisting to focus on its own political rivals and dissidents.

Recent developments have afresh highlighted the blind spots of local media coverage on the two sides of the Gazan frontier. Each source attempts to examine each potential perspective of Hamas’s breaches of the peace. And, typically, the situation that the organization has been stalling the return of the remains of slain Israeli captives has dominated the news.

By contrast, reporting of civilian fatalities in the region stemming from Israeli operations has garnered little focus – or none. Take the Israeli counter strikes following Sunday’s southern Gaza event, in which a pair of soldiers were lost. While local officials stated dozens of deaths, Israeli media pundits questioned the “limited response,” which targeted just facilities.

This is nothing new. Over the previous weekend, Gaza’s media office charged Israeli forces of infringing the truce with the group 47 times since the agreement was implemented, causing the death of 38 Palestinians and wounding an additional 143. The allegation appeared insignificant to most Israeli media outlets – it was simply absent. That included reports that eleven individuals of a Palestinian household were killed by Israeli troops last Friday.

Gaza’s emergency services stated the individuals had been trying to return to their dwelling in the Zeitoun district of Gaza City when the vehicle they were in was targeted for reportedly going over the “boundary” that marks zones under Israeli military command. That boundary is unseen to the naked eye and shows up just on maps and in government documents – sometimes not obtainable to average residents in the region.

Even that incident barely got a note in Israeli journalism. One source mentioned it shortly on its digital site, quoting an Israeli military spokesperson who stated that after a questionable vehicle was spotted, forces fired cautionary rounds towards it, “but the car persisted to approach the forces in a way that caused an immediate risk to them. The troops shot to eliminate the threat, in compliance with the ceasefire.” No injuries were stated.

Amid such perspective, it is understandable a lot of Israelis believe Hamas alone is to at fault for infringing the ceasefire. This view risks prompting calls for a stronger approach in Gaza.

Eventually – maybe in the near future – it will not be enough for all the president’s men to take on the role of kindergarten teachers, advising the Israeli government what to avoid. They will {have to|need