🔗 Share this article

Perhaps the most famous images of the twentieth century portrays an unclothed child, her arms outstretched, her face distorted in terror, her skin blistered and raw. She appears running toward the camera while running from a bombing during the conflict. Beside her, youngsters are fleeing from the devastated community in Trảng Bàng, against a backdrop of black clouds and soldiers.

This International Impact of a Seminal Image

Just after the distribution in June 1972, this image—formally titled "Napalm Girl"—became an analog sensation. Viewed and discussed by millions, it is generally attributed for energizing public opinion critical of the American involvement in Vietnam. One noted thinker later remarked that the deeply indelible image featuring the child Kim Phúc suffering possibly did more to fuel public revulsion regarding the hostilities compared to a hundred hours of broadcast atrocities. A renowned British documentarian who covered the conflict called it the ultimate image of the so-called “The Television War”. Another veteran photojournalist declared that the picture is simply put, one of the most important images in history, especially of that era.

A Long-Standing Attribution and a Recent Claim

For half a century, the photo was assigned to Huynh Cong “Nick” Út, a then-21-year-old local photojournalist on assignment for an international outlet at the time. However a provocative latest documentary streaming on a global network argues that the famous photograph—often hailed as the pinnacle of photojournalism—was actually taken by a different man on the scene in the village.

As claimed by the film, "Napalm Girl" was in fact taken by a freelancer, who provided his work to the organization. The allegation, along with the documentary's following inquiry, began with an individual called an ex-staffer, who claims how a dominant editor instructed the staff to reassign the image’s credit from the stringer to Út, the one AP staff photographer on site that day.

This Search to find the Truth

Robinson, currently elderly, contacted a filmmaker in 2022, seeking assistance to locate the unnamed photographer. He mentioned that, should he still be alive, he wanted to give an acknowledgment. The investigator considered the independent photographers he worked with—seeing them as the stringers of today, who, like Vietnamese freelancers at the time, are often marginalized. Their contributions is frequently challenged, and they work in far tougher circumstances. They have no safety net, no retirement plans, minimal assistance, they usually are without adequate tools, and they are highly exposed when documenting in familiar settings.

The investigator asked: Imagine the experience for the individual who took this photograph, if indeed Nick Út didn’t take it?” As an image-maker, he thought, it must be deeply distressing. As a student of photojournalism, specifically the highly regarded war photography from that war, it could prove reputation-threatening, maybe legacy-altering. The revered history of the image among the community was so strong that the creator with a background left at the time was reluctant to pursue the film. He expressed, “I didn’t want to challenge the accepted account that Nick had taken the image. Nor did I wish to change the status quo of a community that had long looked up to this achievement.”

This Investigation Unfolds

Yet both the filmmaker and his collaborator concluded: it was important posing the inquiry. When reporters are to keep the world in the world,” noted the journalist, it is essential that we are willing to pose challenging queries of ourselves.”

The documentary tracks the investigators while conducting their own investigation, from eyewitness interviews, to call-outs in today's Ho Chi Minh City, to archival research from related materials taken that day. Their work finally produce an identity: Nguyễn Thành Nghệ, a driver for a news network during the attack who also sold photographs to foreign agencies as a freelancer. In the film, a moved Nghệ, now also advanced in age and living in the United States, states that he provided the image to the AP for $20 with a physical photo, but was haunted without recognition for decades.

This Reaction Followed by Further Analysis

Nghệ appears in the film, reserved and reflective, but his story became explosive within the world of photojournalism. {Days before|Shortly prior to